« A Willful Intelligence Failure? | Main | Those 500 Chemical Munitions: the Unasked Question »

June 21, 2006

Comments

Herb Ely

Jon, I don't think that the 1% was meant to be a literal number. The point was, I think, that we have to respond to an improbable but highly dangerous threat. The question is: What is a proportionate response? During the Cold War the US and the Soviet Union were willing to risk bankrupting themselves to defend against an unlikely nuclear attack. Many people argued that this was an over-response on both sides.

While I agree with Cheney on this point (not that he cares), I think that he overestimated the threat and launched a disproportionate response.

Alan Reynolds

I greatly appreciate the plug. Nobody has yet suggested that I made any big mistakes about this, and it is not that I don't get criticism.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Marie Ely's Poetry

Books

St. Blog's Parish

Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 01/2004

StatCounter

  • StatCounter